|
REFERENCES
- Luz Gibbons et al. The Global Numbers and costs of Additionally Needed and Unnecessary Caesarean Sections Performed Per Year: Overuse as a Barrier to Universal Coverage. World Health Report (2010)
- Sur S, Mackenzie IZ. Does discussion of possible scar influence preferred mode of delivery after cesarean section? J ObstetGynecol2005; 25:338-41.
- Zelop C, Heffner LJ. The downside of cesarean delivery: short and long term complications. ClinObstetGynecol 2004; 47:386-93.
- Center for Disease Control and Prevention. C-sections rise, so do premature births. Hindustan Times. New Delhi. 2005; 23 Nov.
- Khawaja M, Kabakian. Khasholian T, Jurdi R. Determinants of cesarean section in Egypt. Evidence from demographic and healthsurvey. Health Policy 2004; 69:273-81.
- Jurdi R, Khawaja M. Cesarean section rates in Arab region: a cross national study. Health Policy Plan 2004;19:101-10.
- Wagner M. Choosing cesarean section. Lancet 2000; 356:1677-80.
- Caesarean sections. Postnote No. 184. London: Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology; 2002. Available from: http://www.parliament.uk/post/pn184.pdf.
- World Health Organization. Appropriatetechnology for birth. Lancet 1985; 2(8452):436-7.
- C Black, JA Kaye, H Jick. Caesarean delivery in the United Kingdom: time trends in the general practice research database ObstetGynecol2005; 106:151-5.
- Laws, PJ, Sullivan EA. Australia’s mothers andbabies 2002. Perinatal Statistics Series No. 15.Sydney: National Perinatal Statistics Unit; 2004
- AL Tranquilli, SR Giannubilo.Cesarean delivery on maternal request in Italy.Int J GynaecolObstet 2004; 84: 169-70.
- R Dobson. Caesarean section rate in England and Wales hits 21%. BMJ 2001; 323:951
- IIPS and Macro International (2007): National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3),2005- 06, India, Vol. I andVol. II, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai
- Mishra, U.S., Ramanathan M. (2002): “Delivery-related complications and determinants of caesarean section rates in India”. Health Policy and Planning, 17(1):90-98
- Biswas A. B., Das D. K., Misra R., Roy R. N., Ghosh D., Mitra K. (2005): “Availablity and Use of Emergency Obstetric Care Services in Four Districts of West Bengal, India”, J Health PopulNutr, 23(3): 266-274.
- Pahari K., Ghosh A. (1997): “Study of Pregnancy Outcome over a Period of Five Years in a Postgraduate Institute of West Bengal”, J Indian Med Assoc, 95(6): 172- 174.
- Kambo I., Bedi N., Dhillon B. S., Saxena N. C. (2002): “A Critical Appraisal of Caesarean Section Rates at Teaching Hospitals in India”, Int J Gynecol and Obstet, 79(2): 151-158.
- Padmadas, S. S., Kumar S. S., Nair S. B., Kumari A. K. R. (2000): “Caesarean section delivery in Kerala, India: evidence from a National Health Survey”. Social Science and Medicine, 51:511-521.
- FIGO Committee for the Ethial Aspects of Human Reproduction and women’s Health. Ethical aspects regarding cesarean delivery for non-medical reasons.Int J ObstetGynecol 1999; 64:217-21.
- Thomas J, Parenajothy S. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. The NationalSentinel Cesarean Section Audit Report. London. RCOG Press. 2001
- Editorial. Cesarean section on the rise. Lancet 2000;356;1697
- Mackenzie IZ, Cooke I, Annan B. Indications for cesarean section in a consultant unit over the decades. J ObstetGynecol 2003; 23:233-8.
- Harper MA, Byington RP, Espeland MA et al. Pregnancy related death and health care services. Am J ObstetGynecol 2003; 102:273-8.
- Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in UK. London. RCOG Press. 2001
- Van Ham M, van Dongen P, Mulder J. Maternal consequences of cesarean section: a retrospective study of intraoperative and postoperative maternal complications of cesarean section during a 10 year period. Eur J ObstetGynecolReprodBiol 1997; 74:1-6.
- Kaemar J, Bhimani L, Boyd M et al. Route of delivery as a risk factor for emergent peripartum hysterectomy: a case-control study. ObstetGynecol 2003; 102:141-5.
- Smith JF, Hernandez C, Wax JR. Fetal laceration injury at cesarean delivery. ObstetGynecol 1997; 90:344-6.
- Wagner M. Pursuing the birth machine: the search for appropriate birth technology. Syndey.ACE Graphics. 1994.
- Zelop C, Heffner LJ. The downside of cesarean delivery: short and long term complications. ClinObstetGynecol 2004; 47:386-93.
- Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR et al. First-birth cesarean and placental abruption or previa at second birth. ObstetGynecol2001; 97:765-9.
- Gilliam M, Rosenberg D, Davis F. The likelihood of placenta previawith greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity.ObstetGynecol 2002; 99:976-80.
- Miller DA, Choller JA, Goodwin TM. Clinical risk factors for placenta previaaccreta. Am J ObstetGynecol 1997; 177:210-4.
- Zaki Z, Bahar AM, Ali ME et al. Risk factors and morbidity in patients with placenta previaaccreta compared to placenta previanon-accreta. ActaObstetGynecolScand 1998; 77:391-4.
- Catanzarite VA, Lorrain MS, Schrimmer DR et al. Managing placenta previaaccreta. ContempObstetGynecol 1996; 41:66-95.
- Chung CL, Cheng PJ, Liang CC et al. Obstetrical hysterectomy and placenta previa / accreta. Three bladder injury case reports. ChangeGung Med J 1997; 20:44-51
STATPERSON PUBLISHING GROUP | Aurangabad | Maharashtra |2016 | INDIA
© Copyright 2016 Statperson Publishing Corporation. a division of Statperson Consultancy.
All Rights Reserved.
|
|