REFERENCES

1. Luz Gibbons et al. The Global Numbers and costs of Additionally Needed and Unnecessary Caesarean Sections Performed Per Year: Overuse as a Barrier to Universal Coverage. World Health Report (2010)
2. Sur S, Mackenzie IZ. Does discussion of possible scar influence preferred mode of delivery after cesarean section? J ObstetGynecol2005; 25:338-41.
3. Zelop C, Heffner LJ. The downside of cesarean delivery: short and long term complications. ClinObstetGynecol 2004; 47:386-93.
4. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. C-sections rise, so do premature births. Hindustan Times. New Delhi. 2005; 23 Nov.
5. Khawaja M, Kabakian. Khasholian T, Jurdi R. Determinants of cesarean section in Egypt. Evidence from demographic and healthsurvey. Health Policy 2004; 69:273-81.
6. Jurdi R, Khawaja M. Cesarean section rates in Arab region: a cross national study. Health Policy Plan 2004;19:101-10.
7. Wagner M. Choosing cesarean section. Lancet 2000; 356:1677-80.
8. Caesarean sections. Postnote No. 184. London: Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology; 2002. Available from: http://www.parliament.uk/post/pn184.pdf.
9. World Health Organization. Appropriatetechnology for birth. Lancet 1985; 2(8452):436-7.
10. C Black, JA Kaye, H Jick. Caesarean delivery in the United Kingdom: time trends in the general practice research database ObstetGynecol2005; 106:151-5.
11. Laws, PJ, Sullivan EA. Australia’s mothers andbabies 2002. Perinatal Statistics Series No. 15.Sydney: National Perinatal Statistics Unit; 2004
12. AL Tranquilli, SR Giannubilo.Cesarean delivery on maternal request in Italy.Int J GynaecolObstet 2004; 84: 169-70.
13. R Dobson. Caesarean section rate in England and Wales hits 21%. BMJ 2001; 323:951
14. IIPS and Macro International (2007): National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3),2005- 06, India, Vol. I andVol. II, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai
15. Mishra, U.S., Ramanathan M. (2002): “Delivery-related complications and determinants of caesarean section rates in India”. Health Policy and Planning, 17(1):90-98
16. Biswas A. B., Das D. K., Misra R., Roy R. N., Ghosh D., Mitra K. (2005): “Availablity and Use of Emergency Obstetric Care Services in Four Districts of West Bengal, India”, J Health PopulNutr, 23(3): 266-274.
17. Pahari K., Ghosh A. (1997): “Study of Pregnancy Outcome over a Period of Five Years in a Postgraduate Institute of West Bengal”, J Indian Med Assoc, 95(6): 172- 174.
18. Kambo I., Bedi N., Dhillon B. S., Saxena N. C. (2002): “A Critical Appraisal of Caesarean Section Rates at Teaching Hospitals in India”, Int J Gynecol and Obstet, 79(2): 151-158.
19. Padmadas, S. S., Kumar S. S., Nair S. B., Kumari A. K. R. (2000): “Caesarean section delivery in Kerala, India: evidence from a National Health Survey”. Social Science and Medicine, 51:511-521.
20. FIGO Committee for the Ethial Aspects of Human Reproduction and women’s Health. Ethical aspects regarding cesarean delivery for non-medical reasons.Int J ObstetGynecol 1999; 64:217-21.
21. Thomas J, Parenajothy S. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. The NationalSentinel Cesarean Section Audit Report. London. RCOG Press. 2001
22. Editorial. Cesarean section on the rise. Lancet 2000;356;1697
23. Mackenzie IZ, Cooke I, Annan B. Indications for cesarean section in a consultant unit over the decades. J ObstetGynecol 2003; 23:233-8.
24. Harper MA, Byington RP, Espeland MA et al. Pregnancy related death and health care services. Am J ObstetGynecol 2003; 102:273-8.
25. Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in UK. London. RCOG Press. 2001
26. Van Ham M, van Dongen P, Mulder J. Maternal consequences of cesarean section: a retrospective study of intraoperative and postoperative maternal complications of cesarean section during a 10 year period. Eur J ObstetGynecolReprodBiol 1997; 74:1-6.
27. Kaemar J, Bhimani L, Boyd M et al. Route of delivery as a risk factor for emergent peripartum hysterectomy: a case-control study. ObstetGynecol 2003; 102:141-5.
28. Smith JF, Hernandez C, Wax JR. Fetal laceration injury at cesarean delivery. ObstetGynecol 1997; 90:344-6.
29. Wagner M. Pursuing the birth machine: the search for appropriate birth technology. Syndey.ACE Graphics. 1994.
30. Zelop C, Heffner LJ. The downside of cesarean delivery: short and long term complications. ClinObstetGynecol 2004; 47:386-93.
31. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR et al. First-birth cesarean and placental abruption or previa at second birth. ObstetGynecol2001; 97:765-9.
32. Gilliam M, Rosenberg D, Davis F. The likelihood of placenta previawith greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity.ObstetGynecol 2002; 99:976-80.
33. Miller DA, Choller JA, Goodwin TM. Clinical risk factors for placenta previaaccreta. Am J ObstetGynecol 1997; 177:210-4.
34. Zaki Z, Bahar AM, Ali ME et al. Risk factors and morbidity in patients with placenta previaaccreta compared to placenta previanon-accreta. ActaObstetGynecolScand 1998; 77:391-4.
35. Catanzarite VA, Lorrain MS, Schrimmer DR et al. Managing placenta previaaccreta. ContempObstetGynecol 1996; 41:66-95.
36. Chung CL, Cheng PJ, Liang CC et al. Obstetrical hysterectomy and placenta previa / accreta. Three bladder injury case reports. ChangeGung Med J 1997; 20:44-51