Home| Journals | Statistics Online Expert | About Us | Contact Us
    About this Journal  | Table of Contents
Untitled Document

[Abstract] [PDF] [HTML] [Linked References]

A Stochastic Analysis of Two Competitive Interacting Species with Bionomic Harvesting of Both the Species

 

R. Srilatha1*, B. Ravindra Reddy2†, N. Ch. Pattabhiramacharyulu3

1Sree Chaitanya Inst. of Tech. & Sci., Thimmapur, Karimnagar-505527, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA.

2Department of Mathematics, JNTUH CE, Nachupally, Karimnagar-505501, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA.

3Professor (Retd.) of Mathematics, NIT, Warangal – 506004, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA.

Corresponding Addresses:

*[email protected], [email protected]

Research Article

 


Abstract: This paper deals with two species competitive model with both the first and second species are harvested under bionomic conditions. The model is characterized by a pair of first order non-linear ordinary differential equations. All the possible equilibrium points of the model are identified and the criteria for the local and global stabilities are discussed .The possibility of existence of bio economic equilibrium is being discussed. We also provide analytical estimates of the population intensities of fluctuations by Fourier transform methods.

 

  1. Introduction

There is an extensive study on several kinds of prey- predator interactions after it was initiated by Lotka [1] and Volterra [2]. Bionomics of natural resources has played a significant role in all these interactions. There is a strong impact of harvesting on the dynamic evolution of a population. In fishery, forestry, agriculture and wild life management, the exploitation of biological resources and harvesting of population species can be seen. The problems of predator-prey systems in the presence of harvesting were discussed by many authors and attention on economic policies from harvesting have also been analysed.  A detailed discussion on the issues and techniques associated with the bionomic exploitation of natural resources was given by Clark [3, 4]. A study on a class of predator-prey models under constant rate of harvesting of both species simultaneously was made by Brauer and Soudack [5, 6]. Multi-species harvesting models are also studied in detail by Chaudhuri [7, 8].  In the study of population dynamics, many Mathematical models have been proposed.  In order to reflect the dynamical behavior of the models depending on the existing data and information of the system, it is often necessary to incorporate stochastic term with additive noise. For long time, it has been recognized that stochastic terms have very complicated impact on the dynamics of a system, which can not cause the instability but also induce some noise, in terms of oscillations and periodic solutions.  Models on the combined harvesting of a two species prey predator fishery have been discussed by Ragozin and Brown [9], Chaudhuri and Saha Ray [11], etc. A resource based competitive system in three species with persistence and global stability of the system was studied by chattopadhyaya and et.al. [10]. Prey-predator model with harvesting was also studied by Dai and Tang [12].  In 1973, Holling [15] emphasized the influence of noise in ecological dynamics and resilience. The noise may arise from stochastic disturbance of the external environment. Under the disturbance of noise, the species dynamics are always stochastic or seemingly stochastic.  In 1996 J. Ripa et. al [16] examined the noise colour and the risk of population extinction in a prey predator system widely. In 2003 Xu, C, et.al [14] investigated about White noise or noise with a white variance spectrum contains no temporal autocorrelation and is essentially a series of independent random numbers about the population dynamics and color environmental noise of a three species food chain system. Later in 2009, Sun, G.Q et.al [17] emphasized the role of noise in a predator–prey model with Allee effect. In 2011, Wenting Wang et.al [18] found the effect of colored noise on spatiotemporal dynamics of biological invasion in a diffusive predator-prey system.  K. Shiva Reddy et.al [13] proposed the mathematical model for the three species ecosystem comprising of two predators competing for the prey. They also investigated the stability concepts using various mathematical techniques.

In this connection here we constructed a mathematical model based on the system of non-linear equations. The global stability of the system at interior steady state is determined and illustrated numerically. The conditions of the existence of a bionomic equilibrium are discussed by taking simple economic considerations into an account. We also provide analytical estimates of the population intensities of fluctuations by Fourier transform methods.

2.         Mathematical Model

The model equations for a two species competitive system are given by the following system of non-linear ordinary differential equations

1                               (2.1)

2                               (2.2) 

where 3 and 5are the populations of the first and second species with natural growth rates (bio potentials) 7and 8respectively, 9is rate of decrease of the first species due to insufficient food, 10is rate of decrease of the first species due to inhibition by the second species, 11is rate of decrease of the second species due to inhibition by the first species, 12is rate of decrease of the second species due to insufficient food other than the first species; 13is the catch ability co-efficient of the first species, 1is the harvesting effort, 15is the catch ability co-efficient of the second species, 16is the harvesting effort, and 17 , 18are the catch-rate functions based on the catch-per-unit-effort hypothesis. Further both the variables 4 and 6are non-negative and the model parameters

1920are assumed to be non-negative constants.

 

 

3.   Analysis of Equilibrium Points

The steady state equations of (2.1)-(2.2) are

21                                                                                (3.1)

            22                                                    (3.2)

The four possible equilibrium points are

 (i)   23(In the absence of both the first and second species),

(ii)  24 (In the absence of second species),

(iii) 25 (In the absence of first species),

(iv)  1  (The interior steady state)

 

Case (i):  The population is extinct and this steady state always exists.

Case (ii):  If 1 is the positive solution of equation (3.1), then1        

which is always positive because of the initial assumption 1.

Case (iii): If1is the positive solution of the equation (3.2), then 1which is always positive because of the initial assumption1.

Case (iv): If 1 are the positive solutions of (3.1) & (3.2), then

1 

1 

This state would exists only when 1, 1, 1 

4.   Discussion about Local Stability

In this section the characteristic equation is

11          (4.1)

Since the sum of the roots of (4.1) is

 1                                       (4.2)

which is negative and the product of the roots 1                        (4.3)

is positive, the roots of (4.1) can be noted to be negative. Hence the system is locally asymptotically stable.

 

5.   Discussion about Global Stability

Theorem: The Equilibrium point 1 is globally asymptotically stable.

Proof: let us consider the following Liapunov function

11

where 1is suitable positive constant.

Differentiating V w.r.to‘t’ we get

1

111+      1

1      1

 

1   +1

1+       1

1

1

 1

 <0                   

Hence1is asymptotically stable. Therefore, the equilibrium point 1is globally asymptotically stable.

6.         Bionomic Equilibrium

The bionomic equilibrium is nothing but the combination of the concepts of biological equilibrium as well as economic equilibrium. A biological equilibrium is given by11. The economic equilibrium is said to be achieved when the total revenue obtained by selling the harvested biomass equals the total cost for the effort devoted to harvesting. Let1,1be fishing cost per unit effort of the first and second species respectively. Let 1 be price per unit biomass of the first and second species respectively. Therefore net revenue or economic rent at any time given by1.

Where1 is the net economic revenue for the first species and 1is the net economic revenue for the second species at any time t. The bionomic equilibrium 1 is given by the following equations

1                (6.1)

                                                               

1             (6.2)

 1                            (6.3)

 In order to determine the bionomic equilibrium we come across the following cases.

Case (i):  If for the second species, fishing cost is greater than the revenue (1), then fishing of second species is not feasible. Hence fishing of first species population remains operational (1).  Thus, when  1  and  1 we have

1, 1  (6.4)

Case (ii):  If the cost is greater than the revenue in the first species fishing, then the first species fishing will be closed (i.e. 1= 0).Only second species fishing remains operational.

1, 1

(6.5)

Case (iii): If  1 ,1 , then the cost is greater than revenues for both the species and the whole fishery will be closed.

Case (iv):  If  1 ,1, then  the revenues for both the species being  positive, then the whole fishery will be in operation.

In this case   1                                      (6.6)

                     1                                         (6.7)

Substitute (6.6) and (6.7) in (6.1), (6.2) we get

1                                     (6.8)

1                            (6.9)        1if

1                    (6.10)

1if  1         (6.11) 

The Non-trivial Bionomic equilibrium point 1 exists, if (6.10) and (6.11) must hold.

7.         A Stochastic Model

The main assumption that leads us to extend the deterministic model (2.1)-(2.2) to a stochastic counterpart is that it is reasonable to conceive the open sea as a noisy environment. There are many number of ways in which environmental noise may be incorporated in system (2.1)-(2.2). Note that environmental noise should be distinguished from demographic or internal noise, for which the variation over time is due. External noise may arise either form random fluctuations of one or more model parameters around some known mean values or from stochastic fluctuations of the population densities around some constant values.  

In this section, we compute the population intensities of fluctuations (variances) around the positive equilibrium 1due to noise, according to the method introduced by Nisbet and Gunney (1982). Now we assume the presence of randomly fluctuating driving forces on the deterministic growth of the first and second species populations at time ‘t’, so that the system (2.1)-(2.2)results in the stochastic delay system with ‘additive noise’

1             (7.1)

1           (7.2)

where 1 represents first species, 1 represents second species.  1 are real constants and  1 is a 2D Gaussian White noise process satisfying

1                            

1

where  1 is the Kronecker symbol; 1 is the 1-dirac function.

Let 1 1        (7.3)

1 1;    

Using (7.3), equation (7.1) becomes

1

1  1

11                                   (7.4)

The linear part of (7.4) is 

1      (7.5)

Again using (7.3) equation (7.2) becomes

11

+1                                (7.6)

The linear part of (7.6) is 1   (7.7)

 Taking the Fourier transform on both sides of (7.5), (7.7) we get,

1           (7.8)

1            (7.9)

The matrix form of (7.8),(7.9) is

1                                                       (7.10)

where 

1 ;  1 ;  1;

1; 1; 1; 1                                                      (7.11)

Eqn.(7.10) can also be written as    1

Let 1, therefore, 1                                               (7.12)

where 1                                        (7.13)

if the function 1 has a zero mean value , then the fluctuation intensity (variance) of it’s components in the frequency interval 1 is 1

where 1is spectral density of 1 and is defined as

1                                        (7.14)

If  1 has a zero mean value, the inverse transform of 1is the auto covariance function

1                                        (7.15)

The corresponding variance of fluctuations in 1 is given by

1                                        (7.16)

and the auto correlation function is the normalized auto covariance

1                                                    (7.17)

For a Gaussian white noise process, it is

1

1

1                                                                                     (7.18)

From (7.12), we have 1                                (7.19)

From (7.14) we have

1                                         (7.20)

Hence by (7.16) and (7.20), the intensities of fluctuations in the variable 1 are given by

1                       (7.21)

and by (7.13), we obtain

1

1                 (7.22)

where  1                       (7.23)

Real part of  1 (7.24)

Imaginary part of1           (7.25)

Finally from (7.11) we get

 1; 1;1;1                                                               (7.26)

 

By substitution of (7.23), (7.11) in (7.22), we get,      

1                   (7.27)

1                                            (7.28)

If we are interested in the dynamics of system (7.1)-(7.2) with either 1 or 1 then the population variances are

If1, then

1                                       (7.29) 

1                                  (7.30)

If1, then

1                          (7.31)

1                  (7.32)

8.         Numerical Simulation 

In this paper, we substantiate as well as augment our analytical findings through numerical simulations considering the following parameters.

Example (1):

1                

  

            

               

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure (8.1)

Figure (8.1) shows that the variation of population against time, initially with1

 

Example(2):

11                            

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure (8.2)

Figure (8.2) shows that the variation of population against time initially with 1

9.   Discussion and Concluding Remarks

In this paper, a model of a competitive system with stochastic term was formulated. Initially we have discussed about the model without stochastic term and investigated the existence of equilibrium points, local stability by employing Routh-Hurwitz criteria, global stability by constructing Lyapunov function. We incorporated the stochastic term in the model, also we present spatial competition model that contains some important factors, and such as the population intensities of fluctuations (variances) around the positive equilibrium due to noise are computed and also analyzed the stability with graphical representation using Matlab. Some Numerical simulations for justifying the theoretical analysis are also provided. Here we studied about the competitive model by incorporating environmental fluctuations through additive White noise. The analytical results and numerical simulation of deterministic model suggest that the deterministic competitive model is stable. The stable nature of the system shows this situation in figures (8.1)-(8.2). Further for stochastic model system population vacancies characterize the stochastic stability of the system.  Therefore by contolling the environmental fluctuations, the existence of the system can be checked. 

 

References

  1. Lotka, A.J.,Elements of Physical biology, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore,1925.
  2. Volterra, V., Leconssen la theorie mathematique de la leitte pou lavie,Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1931.
  3. C. W. Clark, MathematicalBioeconomics: The Optimal Management of Renewable Resources, Wiley, New York 1976.
  4. C.W. Clark, Bioeconomic Modeling and Fisheries Management,Wiley, NewYork 1985.
  5. F. Brauer, A.C. Soudack, Stability regions and transition phenomena for harvested predator–prey systems, J. Math. Biol. 7 (1979) pp319–337.
  6. F. Brauer, A.C. Soudack, Stability regions in predator–prey systems with constant rate   prey harvesting, J. Math. Biol. 8 (1979) pp55–71.
  7. K.S. Chaudhuri, A bioeconomic model of harvesting a multispecies fishery, Ecol. Model. 32 (1986), pp. 267–279.
  8. K.S. Chaudhuri, Dynamic optimization of combined harvesting of a two-species fishery.   Ecol. Model. 41 (1988),pp. 17–25.
  9. D. L. Ragozin and G. Brown, “Harvest policies and nonmarket valuation in a predatorprey system”, J. Envirn.Econ. Manag. 12, 1985, pp.155–168.
  10. J. Chattopadhyay, A. Mukhopadhyay , P.K. Tapaswi, A resource based competitive   system in three species fishery, Nonlinear Stud. 3 (1996) pp73-83.
  11. K.S. Chaudhuri and S.S. Ray, “On the combined harvesting of a prey-predator system”, J. Biol. Sys. 4. 1996, pp.373-389.
  12. G. Dai, M. Tang, Coexistence region and global dynamics of a harvested predator–pray systems, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 58 (1998) pp193–210.
  13. K. Shiva Reddy and N.Ch. Pattabhi Ramacharyulu , A three species ecosystem comprising of two predators competing for a prey, Advances in Applied science research, 2 (2011), pp208-218.
  14. Xu, C., Li, Z., Population dynamics and the color of environmental noise: a study on a three-species food chain system. Ecol. Res. 18 (2003)145–154.
  15. Holling, C.S., Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Ann. Rev. Ecolog.Syst. 4 (1973)1–23.
  16. Ripa, J., Lundberg, P., Noise colour and the risk of population extinction. Proc.R. Soc. Lond. B 263, (1996) 1751–1753.
  17. Sun, G.Q., Jin, Z., Li, L., Liu, Q.X., The role of noise in a predator–prey model with Allee effect. J. Biol. Phys. 35 (2009) 185–196.
  18. Wenting Wang, Wenlong Li , Zizhen Li , Hui Zhang, The effect of colored noise on spatiotemporal dynamics of biological invasion in a diffusive predator–prey system, Bio Systems 104 (2011) 48-56.

 

 
 
 
 
 
  Copyrights statperson consultancy www

Copyrights statperson consultancy www.statperson.com  2013. All Rights Reserved.

Developer Details