Home| Journals | Statistics Online Expert | About Us | Contact Us
    About this Journal  | Table of Contents
Untitled Document

[Abstract] [PDF] [HTML] [Linked References]

International Journal of Statistika and Mathematika, ISSN: 2277- 2790 E-ISSN: 2249-8605

Volume 9, Issue 1, February 2014 pp 34-39

Research Article

Designing of Generalized Two Plan System with Repetitive Deferred Sampling Plan as Reference Plan Using Minimum Risks

 

K. K. Suresh1, K. Vinitha Xavier2

1Professor and Head of the Department, 2Ph.D Research Scholar

Department of Statistics, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore-641046, Tamilnadu, INDIA.


Academic Editor: Dr. Dase R.K.

 

Linked References

            1. Calvin,T.W., “TNT Zero Acceptance Number Sampling,”American Society for Quality Control, Technical Conference Transactions, Philadelphia, Pennsylvenia, pp.35-39, 1977.
            2. Chintha Zacharias., “Certain Study Relating to Generalized Two-Plan System Indexed through Specified Quality Levels,” MPhil Thesis, Bharathiar University, India, 2006.
            3. Dodge, H.F., “A General Procedure for Sampling Inspection by Attributes- Based on the AQL Concept,” Technical Report No.10, The Statistics Centre, Rutgers – The State University, New Brunswick, New Jersy, 1959.
            4. Dodge,H.F., “Evolution of Sampling Inspection System having rules for Switching between Normal and Tightened Inspection,” Technical Report No.14, The Statistics Centre, Rutgers- The State University, New Brunswick, New Jersy,1965.
            5. Dodge,H.F.,“A new Dual System of Acceptance Sampling Inspection,” Technical Report No.16, The Statistics Centre, Rutgers- The State University, New Brunswick, New Jersy,1967.
            6. Govindaraju,K., Subramani,K., “Selection of Multiple Deferred State MDS-1Sampling Plans for Given Acceptable Quality Level and Limiting Quality Level involving Minimum Risks,”Journal of Applied Statistics, Vol.17,No.3,pp.427-434,1990.
            7. Golub,A., “Designing Single Sampling Inspection Plans when the sample size is fixed,” J. Amer Statist Assn., Vol.48.pp.278-288, 1953.
            8. Hald.A, Thyregod,P., “The Composite Operating Characteristic Under Normal and Tightened Sampling Inspection by Attributes,” Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, Vol.41, pp.517-529, 1966.
            9. Hobbs,C.F., “Inspection by attributes-A Method of Comparing Rules for Passing between Normal and Tightened Inspection,”International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, Vol.4, No.4, pp.47-60, 1987.
            10. Kuralmani,V., “Studies on Designing Minimum Inspection Attribute Acceptance Sampling Plans,”PhD Thesis, Bharathiar University, India, 1992.
            11. Lilly Christina,A., “Contribution to the study of Design and Analysis of Suspension System and Some other Sampling Plans,” PhD Thesis, Bharathiar University, India,1995.
            12. MIL-STD-105D., “Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection by Attributes,” US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1963.
            13. MIL -STD- 105E., “Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection by Attributes,” US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1989.
            14. Raju,C., “Contributions to the study of Chain Sampling Plans,” PhD Thesis, Bharathiar University, India, 1984.
            15. Romboski,L.D., “An Investigation of Quick Switching Acceptance Sampling Systems,” PhD Thesis, Rutgers- The State University, New Brunswick, New Jersey,1969.
            16. Shankar,G., Mohapatra,B.N., “Analysis of Repetitive Deferred Sampling Plans,” IAPQR Transactions, Vol.16, No.2, pp.17-25,1991.
            17. Suresh,K.K., “A study on Acceptance Sampling Plan using Acceptable and Limiting Quality Levels,” PhD Thesis, Bharathiar University, India,1993.
            18. Suresh,K.K., Saminathan,R., “Construction and Selection of Repetitive Deferred Sampling (RDS) Plan through Acceptable and Limiting Quality Levels,” International Journal of Statistics and Systems, Vol.65, No.3, pp.257-264, 2010.
            19. Soundararajan,V., “Procedures and Tables for Construction and Selection of Chain Sampling Plans (ChSp -1),” Part – 1, Journal of Quality Technology, Vol.10, No.2, pp.56-60,1978a.
            20. Soundararajan,V., “Procedures and Tables for Construction and Selection of Chain Sampling Plans (ChSp -1),” Part – 2, Journal of Quality Technology, Vol.10, No.3,pp.99-103, 1978b.
            21. Soundararajan,V., “Single Sampling Attribute Plans Indexed by AQL and AOQL,” Journal of Quality Technology, Vol.13, No.3, pp.195-200,1981.
            22. Soundararajan,V., Govindaraju,K., “A Note On Designing Chain Sampling Plans ChSP-1,” The QR Journal, Vol.9, No.3, pp.121-123, 1982.
            23. V.Soundararajan,V., Vijayaraghavan,R., “On Designing Multiple Deferred State Sampling [MDS-1(0,2)] Plans Involving Minimum Risks,”Journal of Applied Statistics, Vol.16, No.1, pp.87-94,1989b.
            24. Sivasankari,S., “Certain results on STDS plan and Generalized Two-Plan System,” MPhil Thesis, Bharathiar University, India, 2004.
            25. Subramani,K.,“Studies on Designing Attribute Acceptance Sampling Plans with Emphasis on Chain Sampling plans,” PhD Thesis, Bharathiar University, India, 1991.
            26. Vaerst,R., “A Procedure to Construct Multiple Deferred State Sampling Plans, Methods of Operations Research, Vol.37, pp. 477-485, 1981.
            27. Wortham,A.W., Baker,R.C., “Multiple Deferred State Sampling Inspection,”The International Journal of Production Research, Vol.14, No.6, pp.719-731,1976.
 
 
 
 
 
  Copyrights statperson consultancy www

Copyrights � statperson consultancy www.statperson.com  2013. All Rights Reserved.

Developer Details